13338 | '"It is snowing" is true if and only if it is snowing' is a partial definition of the concept of truth [Tarski] |
19180 | It is convenient to attach 'true' to sentences, and hence the language must be specified [Tarski] |
19181 | In the classical concept of truth, 'snow is white' is true if snow is white [Tarski] |
19183 | Each interpreted T-sentence is a partial definition of truth; the whole definition is their conjunction [Tarski] |
19182 | Use 'true' so that all T-sentences can be asserted, and the definition will then be 'adequate' [Tarski] |
19196 | Scheme (T) is not a definition of truth [Tarski] |
19198 | We don't give conditions for asserting 'snow is white'; just that assertion implies 'snow is white' is true [Tarski] |
16302 | Tarski did not just aim at a definition; he also offered an adequacy criterion for any truth definition [Halbach on Tarski] |
15339 | Tarski gave up on the essence of truth, and asked how truth is used, or how it functions [Horsten on Tarski] |
10844 | The statement that it is raining perfectly fits the fact that it is raining [Strawson,P] |
18951 | For scientific purposes there is a precise concept of 'true-in-L', using set theory [Putnam] |
19135 | Tarski enumerates cases of truth, so it can't be applied to new words or languages [Davidson] |
19138 | Tarski define truths by giving the extension of the predicate, rather than the meaning [Davidson] |
2570 | The same sentence could be true in one language and meaningless in another, so truth is language-relative [Haack] |
13499 | Tarski reduced truth to reference or denotation [Hart,WD on Field,H] |
10818 | Tarski really explained truth in terms of denoting, predicating and satisfied functions [Field,H] |
19324 | Tarski has to avoid stating how truths relate to states of affairs [Kirkham] |
14965 | Truth rests on Elimination ('A' is true → A) and Introduction (A → 'A' is true) [Gupta] |
10353 | Tarskians distinguish truth from falsehood by relations between members of sets [Kusch] |
4699 | Tarski made truth relative, by only defining truth within some given artificial language [O'Grady] |
10672 | Tarskian semantics says that a sentence is true iff it is satisfied by every sequence [Hossack] |
15340 | Tarski Bi-conditional: if you'll assert φ you'll assert φ-is-true - and also vice versa [Horsten] |
15354 | Tarski's hierarchy lacks uniform truth, and depends on contingent factors [Horsten] |
19101 | Disquotation is bivalent [Misak] |
19096 | Disquotationalism resembles a telephone directory [Misak] |
19106 | Disquotations says truth is assertion, and assertion proclaims truth - but what is 'assertion'? [Misak] |