3644 | Two things being joined together doesn't prove they are the same [Descartes] |
16045 | General facts supervene on particular facts, but cannot be inferred from them [Russell, by Bennett,K] |
16051 | Life has a new supervenient relation, which alters its underlying physical events [Morgan,L] |
16050 | The goodness of a picture supervenes on the picture; duplicates must be equally good [Hare] |
3532 | Solidity in a piston is integral to its structure, not supervenient [Maslin on Searle] |
3533 | Is supervenience just causality? [Searle, by Maslin] |
3431 | Supervenience suggest dependence without reduction (e.g. beauty) [Kim] |
13745 | Supervenience is not a dependence relation, on the lines of causal, mereological or semantic dependence [Kim] |
13746 | Supervenience is just a 'surface' relation of pattern covariation, which still needs deeper explanation [Kim] |
4242 | Pure supervenience explains nothing, and is a sign of something fundamental we don't know [Nagel] |
8606 | A supervenience thesis is a denial of independent variation [Lewis] |
16056 | Don't just observe supervenience - explain it! [Horgan,T] |
4078 | Constitution (as in a statue constituted by its marble) is supervenience without identity [Crane] |
2398 | Reduction requires logical supervenience [Chalmers] |
3523 | Shadows are supervenient on their objects, but not reducible [Maslin] |
16061 | If some facts 'logically supervene' on some others, they just redescribe them, adding nothing [Lynch/Glasgow] |
9500 | If naturalism refers to supervenience, that leaves necessary entities untouched [Bird] |
21664 | Supervenience offers little explanation for things which necessarily go together [Hofweber] |
17486 | Supervenience is simply modally robust property co-variance [Hendry] |
17322 | Necessities supervene on everything, but don't depend on everything [Liggins] |
16040 | Aesthetics, morality and mind supervene on the physical? Modal on non-modal? General on particular? [Bennett,K] |
16044 | Some entailments do not involve supervenience, as when brotherhood entails siblinghood [Bennett,K] |
16046 | Reduction requires supervenience, but does supervenience suffice for reduction? [Bennett,K] |