22945
|
The dynamic view of motion says it is primitive, and not reducible to objects, properties and times
[Le Poidevin]
|
|
Full Idea:
According to the dynamic account of motion, an object's being in motion is a primitive event, not further analysable in terms of objects, properties and times.
|
|
From:
Robin Le Poidevin (Travels in Four Dimensions [2003], 09 'Zeno')
|
|
A reaction:
[The rival view is 'static'] Physics suggests that motion may be indefinable, but acceleration can be given a reductive account. If time and space are taken as primitive (which seems sensible to me), then making motion also primitive is a bit greedy.
|
22892
|
Experiences of motion may be overlapping, thus stretching out the experience
[Bardon]
|
|
Full Idea:
Experience itself may be constituted by overlapping, very brief, but temporally extended, acts of awareness, each of which encompassesa temporally extended streeeeetch of perceived events.
|
|
From:
Adrian Bardon (Brief History of the Philosophy of Time [2013], 2 'Realism')
|
|
A reaction:
[cites Barry Dainton 2000] I think this sounds better than Russell's suggestion, though along the same lines. I take all brain events to be a sort of memory, briefly retaining their experience. Very fast events blur because of overload.
|