green numbers give full details.
|
back to list of philosophers
|
expand these ideas
Ideas of Paul Audi, by Text
[American, fl. 2012, Professor at the University of Nebraska at Omaha. Son of Robert?]
2012
|
Clarification and Defense of Grounding
|
3.2
|
p.102
|
17292
|
Avoid 'in virtue of' for grounding, since it might imply a reflexive relation such as identity
|
3.2
|
p.103
|
17295
|
Ground relations depend on the properties
|
3.2
|
p.103
|
17294
|
Grounding is a singular relation between worldly facts
|
3.2
|
p.103
|
17293
|
Worldly facts are obtaining states of affairs, with constituents; conceptual facts also depend on concepts
|
3.3
|
p.104
|
17296
|
We must accept grounding, for our important explanations
|
3.3
|
p.104
|
17297
|
A ball's being spherical non-causally determines its power to roll
|
3.3
|
p.105
|
17298
|
Two things being identical (like water and H2O) is not an explanation
|
3.3
|
p.106
|
17299
|
There are plenty of examples of non-causal explanation
|
3.4
|
p.108
|
17300
|
If grounding relates facts, properties must be included, as well as objects
|
3.5
|
p.110
|
17301
|
Reduction is just identity, so the two things are the same fact, so reduction isn't grounding
|
3.8
|
p.117
|
17302
|
Ground is irreflexive, asymmetric, transitive, non-monotonic etc.
|
3.9
|
p.121
|
17303
|
The best critique of grounding says it is actually either identity or elimination
|