I
|
p.168
|
8840
|
There are five possible responses to the problem of infinite regress in justification
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Sceptics respond to the regress problem by denying knowledge; Foundationalists accept justifications without reasons; Positists say reasons terminate is mere posits; Coherentists say mutual support is justification; Infinitists accept the regress.
|
|
|
|
From:
James Van Cleve (Why coherence is not enough [2005], I)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
A nice map of the territory. The doubts of Scepticism are not strong enough for anyone to embrace the view; Foundationalist destroy knowledge (?), as do Positists; Infinitism is a version of Coherentism - which is the winner.
|