2009 | Truth-making and Correspondence |
Intro | p.138 | 18354 | Correspondence is symmetric, while truth-making is taken to be asymmetric |
1 | p.138 | 18355 | What matters is truth-making (not truth-makers) |
1 | p.141 | 18359 | One proposition can be made true by many different facts |
1 | p.141 | 18357 | What makes a disjunction true is simpler than the disjunctive fact it names |
1 | p.141 | 18358 | Two different propositions can have the same fact as truth-maker |
1 | p.141 | 18356 | Correspondence is an over-ambitious attempt to explain truth-making |
2 | p.144 | 18360 | It is assumed that a proposition is necessarily true if its truth-maker exists |
4 | p.152 | 18361 | A reflexive relation entails that the relation can't be asymmetric |
4 | p.153 | 18362 | Examples show that truth-making is just non-symmetric, not asymmetric |
4 | p.154 | 18363 | Correspondence theorists see facts as the only truth-makers |
n 03 | p.155 | 18364 | Correspondence theory likes ideal languages, that reveal the structure of propositions |
n 14 | p.156 | 18365 | If truths are just identical with facts, then truths will make themselves true |