| 1950 | Theology and Falsification |
| p.225 | 1465 | You can't claim a patch of land is tended by a 'gardener' if there is no evidence, and all counter-evidence is rejected | |
| Full Idea: If someone claimed a patch of land was tended by a 'gardener', but there was never a shred of evidence to support this view, the claim would gradually dissolve into meaninglessness, especially if it was suggested that evidence was irrelevant. | |||
| From: report of Antony Flew (Theology and Falsification [1950]) by PG - Db (ideas) |
| p.226 | 1466 | Claims about God don't seem to claim or deny anything tangible, so evidence is irrelevant | |
| Full Idea: An assertion is logically equivalent to denying its opposite, but claims about a 'gardener', or God, make neither claims nor denials of anything, so no evidence can count against the claim, or for it. | |||
| From: report of Antony Flew (Theology and Falsification [1950]) by PG - Db (ideas) |
| p.227 | 1467 | Religious people seem unwilling to accept any evidence that God does not love us, so their claim is unfalsifiable | |
| Full Idea: Religious people seem unwilling to accept any evidence which shows that God does not love us, so what would they accept? If nothing counts that way, their claim is unfalsifiable, and hence meaningless. | |||
| From: report of Antony Flew (Theology and Falsification [1950]) by PG - Db (ideas) |