| 1969 | Morality and Human Sexuality |
| p.220 | p.220 | 20890 | Why do sexual relationships need permanence, if other relationships don't? |
| Full Idea: What is the reason for demanding permanence in the relationship of sexual partners when we do not see such permanence as being importance to other human relationships? | |||
| From: Vincent C. Punzo (Morality and Human Sexuality [1969], p.220) | |||
| A reaction: The distinction may not be that simple. 'Loyalty' must certainly be mentioned. Friends can legitimately drift apart, but to desert a close friend at a time of great need might be as great a crime as adultery. When is loyalty particularly needed? |
| p.221 | p.221 | 20891 | Does engaging in sexual intercourse really need no more thought than playing tennis? |
| Full Idea: It seems strange for a man and a woman to give no more thought to the question of whether they should engage in sexual intercourse than to the question of whether they shoud play tennis. | |||
| From: Vincent C. Punzo (Morality and Human Sexuality [1969], p.221) | |||
| A reaction: This strikes me as a reasonable point, but times have moved on since 1969, and for plenty of people nowadays playing tennis is a bigger issue than having sex, because of the time, equipment and effort involved. |