| 1920 | works |
| 5.3 | p.179 | 13536 | Skolem did not believe in the existence of uncountable sets |
| Full Idea: Skolem did not believe in the existence of uncountable sets. | |||
| From: Thoralf Skolem (works [1920], 5.3) | |||
| A reaction: Kit Fine refers somewhere to 'unrepentent Skolemites' who still hold this view. |
| 1922 | Remarks on axiomatised set theory |
| p.293 | p.293 | 17878 | If a 1st-order proposition is satisfied, it is satisfied in a denumerably infinite domain |
| Full Idea: Löwenheim's theorem reads as follows: If a first-order proposition is satisfied in any domain at all, it is already satisfied in a denumerably infinite domain. | |||
| From: Thoralf Skolem (Remarks on axiomatised set theory [1922], p.293) |
| p.296 | p.296 | 17879 | Axiomatising set theory makes it all relative |
| Full Idea: Axiomatising set theory leads to a relativity of set-theoretic notions, and this relativity is inseparably bound up with every thoroughgoing axiomatisation. | |||
| From: Thoralf Skolem (Remarks on axiomatised set theory [1922], p.296) |
| p.299 | p.299 | 17880 | Integers and induction are clear as foundations, but set-theory axioms certainly aren't |
| Full Idea: The initial foundations should be immediately clear, natural and not open to question. This is satisfied by the notion of integer and by inductive inference, by it is not satisfied by the axioms of Zermelo, or anything else of that kind. | |||
| From: Thoralf Skolem (Remarks on axiomatised set theory [1922], p.299) | |||
| A reaction: This is a plea (endorsed by Almog) that the integers themselves should be taken as primitive and foundational. I would say that the idea of successor is more primitive than the integers. |
| p.300 | p.300 | 17881 | Mathematician want performable operations, not propositions about objects |
| Full Idea: Most mathematicians want mathematics to deal, ultimately, with performable computing operations, and not to consist of formal propositions about objects called this or that. | |||
| From: Thoralf Skolem (Remarks on axiomatised set theory [1922], p.300) |