green numbers give full details.     |    back to list of philosophers     |     unexpand these ideas

Ideas of Norman Malcolm, by Text

[American, 1911 - 1990, Professor at Cornell University. Taught by, and friend of, Wittgenstein.]

1954 Wittgenstein's 'Philosophical Investigations'
p.44 If my conception of pain derives from me, it is a contradiction to speak of another's pain
     Full Idea: If I obtain my conception of pain from pain that I experience, then it will be a part of my conception of pain that I am the only being that can experience it. For me it will be contradiction to speak of another's pain.
     From: Norman Malcolm (Wittgenstein's 'Philosophical Investigations' [1954]), quoted by Alvin Plantinga - De Re and De Dicto p.44
     A reaction: This obviously has the private language argument in the background. It seems to point towards a behaviourist view, that I derive pain from external behaviour in the first instance. So how do I connect the behaviour to the feeling?
1959 Anselm's Argument
2 p.56 God's existence is either necessary or impossible, and no one has shown that the concept of God is contradictory
     Full Idea: God's existence is either impossible or necessary. It can be the former only if the concept of such a being is self-contradictory or in some way logically absurd. Assuming that this is not so, it follows that He necessarily exists.
     From: Norman Malcolm (Anselm's Argument [1959], 2)
     A reaction: The concept of God suggests paradoxes of omniscience, omnipotence and free will, so self-contradiction seems possible. How should we respond if the argument suggests God is necessary, but evidence suggests God is highly unlikely?