more from G.E. Moore

Single Idea 22151

[catalogued under 22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / a. Idealistic ethics]

Full Idea

Moore's Open Question argument led, however unintentionally, to the rise of anti-realism in meta-ethics (which leads to distinguishing values from facts).

Gist of Idea

The Open Question argument leads to anti-realism and the fact-value distinction

Source

comment on G.E. Moore (Principia Ethica [1903]) by Stephen Boulter - Why Medieval Philosophy Matters 4

Book Reference

Boulter,Stephen: 'Why Medieval Philosophy Matters' [Bloomsbury 2019], p.108


A Reaction

I presume that Moore proves that the Good is not natural, and after that no one knows what it is, so it seems to be arbitrary or non-existent (rather than the platonic fact that Moore had hoped for). I vote for naturalistic ethics.