more from Alfred Tarski

### Single Idea 18812

#### [catalogued under 5. Theory of Logic / B. Logical Consequence / 1. Logical Consequence]

Full Idea

Tarski made a division of logical and non-logical vocabulary. He then defined a model as a non-logical assignment satisfying the corresponding sentential function. Then a conclusion follows logically if every model of the premises models the conclusion.

Gist of Idea

Split out the logical vocabulary, make an assignment to the rest. It's logical if premises and conclusion match

Source

report of Alfred Tarski (The Concept of Logical Consequence [1936]) by Ian Rumfitt - The Boundary Stones of Thought 3.2

Book Reference

Rumfitt,Ian: 'The Boundary Stones of Thought' [OUP 2015], p.73

A Reaction

[compressed] This is Tarski's account of logical consequence, which follows on from his account of truth. 'Logical validity' is then 'true in every model'. Rumfitt doubts whether Tarski has given the meaning of 'logical consequence'.

Related Idea

Idea 18811
Tarski uses sentential functions; truly assigning the objects to variables is what satisfies them **[Tarski, by Rumfitt]**