Ideas from 'Clarification and Defense of Grounding' by Paul Audi [2012], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Metaphysical Grounding' (ed/tr Correia,F/Schnieder,B) [CUP 2012,978-1-107-02289-8]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
expand these ideas
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / a. Nature of grounding
17292
|
Avoid 'in virtue of' for grounding, since it might imply a reflexive relation such as identity
|
17295
|
Ground relations depend on the properties
|
17297
|
A ball's being spherical non-causally determines its power to roll
|
17302
|
Ground is irreflexive, asymmetric, transitive, non-monotonic etc.
|
17303
|
The best critique of grounding says it is actually either identity or elimination
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / b. Relata of grounding
17294
|
Grounding is a singular relation between worldly facts
|
17300
|
If grounding relates facts, properties must be included, as well as objects
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / c. Grounding and explanation
17296
|
We must accept grounding, for our important explanations
|
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 1. Grounding / d. Grounding and reduction
17301
|
Reduction is just identity, so the two things are the same fact, so reduction isn't grounding
|
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 8. Facts / b. Types of fact
17293
|
Worldly facts are obtaining states of affairs, with constituents; conceptual facts also depend on concepts
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / a. Types of explanation
17298
|
Two things being identical (like water and H2O) is not an explanation
|
14. Science / D. Explanation / 2. Types of Explanation / g. Causal explanations
17299
|
There are plenty of examples of non-causal explanation
|