Ideas from 'Killing in War' by Jeff McMahan [2009], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Killing in War' by McMahan,Jeff [OUP 2009,978-0-19-960357]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
expand these ideas
20. Action / C. Motives for Action / 4. Responsibility for Actions
|
23616
|
Legal excuses are duress, ignorance, and diminished responsibility
|
25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights
|
23606
|
Liberty Rights are permissions, and Claim Rights are freedom from intervention
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / a. Just wars
|
23595
|
The worst unjustified wars have no aim at all
|
|
23619
|
A defensive war is unjust, if it is responding to a just war
|
|
23620
|
A person or state may be attacked if they are responsible for an unjustified threat
|
|
23598
|
You (e.g. a police officer) are not liable to attack just because you pose a threat
|
|
23594
|
Wars can be unjust, despite a just cause, if they are unnecessary or excessive or of mixed cause
|
|
23597
|
Just war theory says all and only persons posing a threat are liable to attack
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / b. Justice in war
|
23600
|
Proportionality in fighting can't be judged independently of the justice of each side
|
|
23603
|
Can an army start an unjust war, and then fight justly to defend their own civilians?
|
|
23611
|
Soldiers cannot freely fight in unjust wars, just because they behave well when fighting
|
|
23612
|
The law of war differs from criminal law; attacking just combatants is immoral, but legal
|
|
23617
|
If the unjust combatants are morally excused they are innocent, so how can they be killed?
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / c. Combatants
|
23599
|
You don't become a legitimate target, just because you violently resist an unjust attack
|
|
23596
|
If all combatants are seen as morally equal, that facilitates starting unjust wars
|
|
23604
|
Volunteer soldiers accept the risk of attack, but they don't agree to it, or to their deaths
|
|
23608
|
If being part of a big collective relieves soldiers of moral responsibility, why not the leaders too?
|
|
23610
|
If soldiers can't refuse to fight in unjust wars, can they choose to fight in just wars?
|
|
23613
|
Equality is both sides have permission, or both sides are justified, or one justified the other permitted
|
|
23615
|
Fighting unjustly under duress does not justify it, or permit it, but it may excuse it
|
|
23605
|
Soldiers cannot know enough facts to evaluate the justice of their war
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / d. Non-combatants
|
23602
|
Innocence implies not being morally responsible, rather than merely being guiltless
|
25. Social Practice / E. Policies / 1. War / e. Peace
|
23618
|
Unconditional surrender can't be demanded, since evil losers still have legitimate conditions
|