Ideas from 'Troubles with Functionalism' by Ned Block [1978], by Theme Structure
[found in 'The Philosophy of Mind' (ed/tr Beakley,B /Ludlow P) [MIT 1992,0-262-52167-9]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
expand these ideas
15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 5. Qualia / a. Nature of qualia
2584
|
Lobotomised patients can cease to care about a pain
|
15. Nature of Minds / B. Features of Minds / 5. Qualia / c. Explaining qualia
2582
|
A brain looks no more likely than anything else to cause qualia
|
17. Mind and Body / B. Behaviourism / 2. Potential Behaviour
2574
|
Behaviour requires knowledge as well as dispositions
|
17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 1. Functionalism
2575
|
Functionalism is behaviourism, but with mental states as intermediaries
|
2576
|
In functionalism, desires are internal states with causal relations
|
2583
|
You might invert colours, but you can't invert beliefs
|
17. Mind and Body / C. Functionalism / 8. Functionalism critique
2578
|
Could a creature without a brain be in the right functional state for pain?
|
2585
|
Not just any old functional network will have mental states
|
2586
|
In functionalism, what are the special inputs and outputs of conscious creatures?
|
17. Mind and Body / E. Mind as Physical / 7. Anti-Physicalism / b. Multiple realisability
2579
|
Physicalism is prejudiced in favour of our neurology, when other systems might have minds
|
18. Thought / B. Mechanics of Thought / 6. Artificial Thought / b. Turing Machines
2577
|
Simple machine-functionalism says mind just is a Turing machine
|
2580
|
A Turing machine, given a state and input, specifies an output and the next state
|
19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 1. Syntax
2581
|
Intuition may say that a complex sentence is ungrammatical, but linguistics can show that it is not
|