Ideas from 'Equality' by Thomas Nagel [1977], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Mortal Questions' by Nagel,Thomas [CUP 1981,0-521-29460-6]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
unexpand these ideas
23. Ethics / D. Deontological Ethics / 3. Universalisability
3282
|
The general form of moral reasoning is putting yourself in other people's shoes
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
I believe the general form of moral reasoning is to put yourself in other people's shoes.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §9)
|
24. Political Theory / A. Basis of a State / 4. Original Position / c. Difference principle
3278
|
An egalitarian system must give priority to those with the worst prospects in life
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
What makes a system egalitarian is the priority it gives to the claims of those whose overall life prospects put them at the bottom.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §6)
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 1. Grounds of equality
3275
|
Equality was once opposed to aristocracy, but now it opposes public utility and individual rights
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Egalitarianism was once opposed to aristocratic values, but now it is opposed by adherents of two non-aristocratic values: utility (increase benefit, even if unequally) and individual rights (which redistribution violates).
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §2)
|
3281
|
The ideal of acceptability to each individual underlies the appeal to equality
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The ideal of acceptability to each individual underlies the appeal to equality.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §8)
|
3277
|
In judging disputes, should we use one standard, or those of each individual?
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
In assessing equality of claims, it must be decided whether to use a single, objective standard, or whether interests should be ranked by the person's own estimation. Also should they balance momentary or long-term needs?
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §6)
|
25. Social Practice / B. Equalities / 2. Political equality
3274
|
Equality can either be defended as good for society, or as good for individual rights
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The communitarian defence of equality says it is good for society as a whole, whereas the individualistic defence defends equality as a correct distributive principle.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §2)
|
3273
|
Equality nowadays is seen as political, social, legal and economic
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Contemporary political debate recognises four types of equality: political, social, legal and economic.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §1)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
Meaning equality of 1) power and influence, 2) status and respect, 3) rights and justice, 4) wealth.
|
25. Social Practice / C. Rights / 1. Basis of Rights
3276
|
A morality of rights is very minimal, leaving a lot of human life without restrictions or duties
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The morality of rights tends to be a limited, even minimal, morality. It leaves a great deal of human life ungoverned by moral restrictions or requirements.
|
|
|
|
From:
Thomas Nagel (Equality [1977], §5)
|