Ideas from 'Emotivism' by David O. Brink [1995], by Theme Structure

[found in 'Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy' (ed/tr Audi,Robert) [CUP 1995,0-521-48328-x]].

green numbers give full details    |     back to texts     |     expand these ideas

22. Metaethics / C. Ethics Foundations / 2. Source of Ethics / h. Expressivism
Emotivists tend to favour a redundancy theory of truth, making moral judgement meaningless
Emotivism implies relativism about moral meanings, but critics say disagreements are about moral reference
How can emotivists explain someone who recognises morality but is indifferent to it?
Emotivists claim to explain moral motivation by basing morality on non-cognitive attitudes
Emotivists find it hard to analyse assertions of moral principles, rather than actual judgements
Two people might agree in their emotional moral attitude while disagreeing in their judgement