Ideas from 'Must We Believe in Set Theory?' by George Boolos [1997], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Logic, Logic and Logic' by Boolos,George [Harvard 1999,067453767x]].
green numbers give full details 
back to texts

expand these ideas
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 1. Set Theory
10482

The logic of ZF is classical firstorder predicate logic with identity

4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / a. Axioms for sets
10492

A few axioms of set theory 'force themselves on us', but most of them don't

4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 5. Conceptions of Set / d. Naïve logical sets
10485

Naïve sets are inconsistent: there is no set for things that do not belong to themselves

4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 5. Conceptions of Set / e. Iterative sets
10484

The iterative conception says sets are formed at stages; some are 'earlier', and must be formed first

6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. The Infinite / a. The Infinite
10491

Infinite natural numbers is as obvious as infinite sentences in English

6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. The Infinite / f. Uncountable infinities
10483

Mathematics and science do not require very high orders of infinity

6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / a. For mathematical platonism
10490

Mathematics isn't surprising, given that we experience many objects as abstract

8. Modes of Existence / D. Universals / 1. Universals
10488

It is lunacy to think we only see inkmarks, and not wordtypes

9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / a. Nature of abstracta
10487

I am a fan of abstract objects, and confident of their existence

9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / c. Modern abstracta
10489

We deal with abstract objects all the time: software, poems, mistakes, triangles..
