Ideas from 'Grundlagen der Arithmetik (Foundations)' by Gottlob Frege [1884], by Theme Structure

[found in 'The Foundations of Arithmetic (Austin)' by Frege,Gottlob (ed/tr Austin,J.L.) [Blackwell 1980,0-631-12694-5]].

green numbers give full details    |     back to texts     |     expand these ideas

1. Philosophy / E. Nature of Metaphysics / 6. Metaphysics as Conceptual
The syntactic category is primary, and the ontological category is derivative [Wright,C]
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 4. Conceptual Analysis
Never lose sight of the distinction between concept and object
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 5. Linguistic Analysis
Frege was the first to give linguistic answers to non-linguistic questions
Frege initiated linguistic philosophy, studying number through the sense of sentences [Dummett]
1. Philosophy / F. Analytic Philosophy / 6. Logical Analysis
Frege developed formal systems to avoid unnoticed assumptions [Lavine]
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 3. Pure Reason
Thoughts have a natural order, to which human thinking is drawn [Yablo]
2. Reason / A. Nature of Reason / 5. Objectivity
Frege sees no 'intersubjective' category, between objective and subjective [Dummett]
Keep the psychological and subjective separate from the logical and objective
2. Reason / D. Definition / 7. Contextual Definition
Originally Frege liked contextual definitions, but later preferred them fully explicit [Dummett]
Nothing should be defined in terms of that to which it is conceptually prior [Dummett]
2. Reason / E. Argument / 6. Conclusive Proof
Proof aims to remove doubts, but also to show the interdependence of truths
2. Reason / F. Fallacies / 8. Category Mistake / a. Category mistakes
You can't transfer external properties unchanged to apply to ideas
3. Truth / B. Truthmakers / 5. What Makes Truths / c. States of affairs make truths
We need to grasp not number-objects, but the states of affairs which make number statements true [Wright,C]
4. Formal Logic / B. Propositional Logic PL / 2. Tools of Propositional Logic / e. Axioms of PL
Frege agreed with Euclid that the axioms of logic and mathematics are known through self-evidence [Burge]
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / b. Empty (Null) Set
The null set is only defensible if it is the extension of an empty concept [Burge]
It is because a concept can be empty that there is such a thing as the empty class [Dummett]
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 3. Types of Set / e. Equivalence classes
We can introduce new objects, as equivalence classes of objects already known [Dummett]
Frege introduced the standard device, of defining logical objects with equivalence classes [Dummett]
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 4. Axioms for Sets / f. Axiom of Infinity V
Frege, unlike Russell, has infinite individuals because numbers are individuals
4. Formal Logic / F. Set Theory ST / 5. Conceptions of Set / c. Logical sets
A class is, for Frege, the extension of a concept [Dummett]
5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 1. Logical Form
Convert "Jupiter has four moons" into "the number of Jupiter's moons is four"
5. Theory of Logic / E. Structures of Logic / 8. Theories in Logic
Despite Gödel, Frege's epistemic ordering of all the truths is still plausible [Burge]
The primitive simples of arithmetic are the essence, determining the subject, and its boundaries [Jeshion]
5. Theory of Logic / G. Quantification / 6. Plural Quantification
Each horse doesn't fall under the concept 'horse that draws the carriage', because all four are needed [Oliver/Smiley]
5. Theory of Logic / J. Model Theory in Logic / 1. Logical Models
We can show that a concept is consistent by producing something which falls under it
5. Theory of Logic / K. Features of Logics / 1. Axiomatisation
To understand axioms you must grasp their logical power and priority [Burge]
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 3. Nature of Numbers / e. Ordinal numbers
We cannot define numbers from the idea of a series, because numbers must precede that
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 3. Nature of Numbers / l. Zero
Treating 0 as a number avoids antinomies involving treating 'nobody' as a person [Dummett]
For Frege 'concept' and 'extension' are primitive, but 'zero' and 'successor' are defined [Chihara]
If objects exist because they fall under a concept, 0 is the object under which no objects fall [Dummett]
Nought is the number belonging to the concept 'not identical with itself'
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 3. Nature of Numbers / m. One
We can say 'a and b are F' if F is 'wise', but not if it is 'one'
One is the Number which belongs to the concept "identical with 0"
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. Using Numbers / a. Units
You can abstract concepts from the moon, but the number one is not among them
Units can be equal without being identical [Tait]
Frege says only concepts which isolate and avoid arbitrary division can give units [Koslicki]
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. Using Numbers / d. Counting via concepts
Frege's 'isolation' could be absence of overlap, or drawing conceptual boundaries [Koslicki]
Non-arbitrary division means that what falls under the concept cannot be divided into more of the same [Koslicki]
Our concepts decide what is countable, as in seeing the leaves of the tree, or the foliage [Koslicki]
A concept creating a unit must isolate and unify what falls under it
Frege says counting is determining what number belongs to a given concept [Koslicki]
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 4. Using Numbers / e. Counting by correlation
Frege's one-to-one correspondence replaces well-ordering, because infinities can't be counted [Lavine]
6. Mathematics / A. Nature of Mathematics / 5. The Infinite / h. Ordinal infinity
The number of natural numbers is not a natural number [George/Velleman]
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 4. Axioms for Number / a. Axioms for numbers
Arithmetical statements can't be axioms, because they are provable [Burge]
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / c. Fregean numbers
Frege had a motive to treat numbers as objects, but not a justification [Hale/Wright]
Frege claims that numbers are objects, as opposed to them being Fregean concepts [Wright,C]
Numbers are second-level, ascribing properties to concepts rather than to objects [Wright,C]
For Frege, successor was a relation, not a function [Dummett]
Numbers are more than just 'second-level concepts', since existence is also one [George/Velleman]
"Number of x's such that ..x.." is a functional expression, yielding a name when completed [George/Velleman]
A cardinal number may be defined as a class of similar classes [Russell]
Frege gives an incoherent account of extensions resulting from abstraction [Fine,K]
For Frege the number of F's is a collection of first-level concepts [George/Velleman]
Numbers need to be objects, to define the extension of the concept of each successor to n [George/Velleman]
The number of F's is the extension of the second level concept 'is equipollent with F' [Tait]
Frege showed that numbers attach to concepts, not to objects [Wiggins]
Frege replaced Cantor's sets as the objects of equinumerosity attributions with concepts [Tait]
Zero is defined using 'is not self-identical', and one by using the concept of zero [Weiner]
Frege started with contextual definition, but then switched to explicit extensional definition [Wright,C]
Each number, except 0, is the number of the concept of all of its predecessors [Wright,C]
Frege's account of cardinals fails in modern set theory, so they are now defined differently [Dummett]
Frege's incorrect view is that a number is an equivalence class [Benacerraf]
The natural number n is the set of n-membered sets [Yourgrau]
A set doesn't have a fixed number, because the elements can be seen in different ways [Yourgrau]
If you can subdivide objects many ways for counting, you can do that to set-elements too [Yourgrau]
A statement of number contains a predication about a concept
Frege's problem is explaining the particularity of numbers by general laws [Burge]
Individual numbers are best derived from the number one, and increase by one
'Exactly ten gallons' may not mean ten things instantiate 'gallon' [Rumfitt]
Numerical statements have first-order logical form, so must refer to objects [Hodes]
The Number for F is the extension of 'equal to F' (or maybe just F itself)
Numbers are objects because they partake in identity statements [Bostock]
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / d. Hume's Principle
'The number of Fs' is the extension (a collection of first-level concepts) of the concept 'equinumerous with F' [George/Velleman]
Frege's cardinals (equivalences of one-one correspondences) is not permissible in ZFC
Hume's Principle fails to implicitly define numbers, because of the Julius Caesar [Potter]
Frege thinks number is fundamentally bound up with one-one correspondence [Heck]
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 5. Definitions of Number / e. Caesar problem
'Julius Caesar' isn't a number because numbers inherit properties of 0 and successor [George/Velleman]
The words 'There are exactly Julius Caesar moons of Mars' are gibberish [Rumfitt]
From within logic, how can we tell whether an arbitrary object like Julius Caesar is a number? [Friend]
Frege said 2 is the extension of all pairs (so Julius Caesar isn't 2, because he's not an extension) [Shapiro]
Fregean numbers are numbers, and not 'Caesar', because they correlate 1-1 [Wright,C]
One-one correlations imply normal arithmetic, but don't explain our concept of a number
Our definition will not tell us whether or not Julius Caesar is a number
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 6. Mathematics as Set Theory / b. Mathematics is not set theory
If numbers can be derived from logic, then set theory is superfluous [Burge]
6. Mathematics / B. Foundations for Mathematics / 7. Mathematical Structuralism / e. Structuralism critique
If numbers are supposed to be patterns, each number can have many patterns
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / a. For mathematical platonism
Numbers are objects, because they can take the definite article, and can't be plurals
Numbers seem to be objects because they exactly fit the inference patterns for identities
Frege's platonism proposes that objects are what singular terms refer to [Wright,C]
How can numbers be external (one pair of boots is two boots), or subjective (and so relative)? [Weiner]
Identities refer to objects, so numbers must be objects [Weiner]
Numbers are not physical, and not ideas - they are objective and non-sensible
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 2. Intuition of Mathematics
Frege's logicism aimed at removing the reliance of arithmetic on intuition [Yourgrau]
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 4. Mathematical Empiricism / c. Against mathematical empiricism
There is no physical difference between two boots and one pair of boots
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 5. Numbers as Adjectival
It appears that numbers are adjectives, but they don't apply to a single object [George/Velleman]
Numerical adjectives are of the same second-level type as the existential quantifier [George/Velleman]
'Jupiter has many moons' won't read as 'The number of Jupiter's moons equals the number many' [Rumfitt]
The number 'one' can't be a property, if any object can be viewed as one or not one
For science, we can translate adjectival numbers into noun form
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / a. Early logicism
Arithmetic is analytic [Weiner]
Logicism shows that no empirical truths are needed to justify arithmetic [George/Velleman]
Frege offered a Platonist version of logicism, committed to cardinal and real numbers [Hale/Wright]
Mathematics has no special axioms of its own, but follows from principles of logic (with definitions) [Bostock]
Numbers are definable in terms of mapping items which fall under concepts [Scruton]
Arithmetic must be based on logic, because of its total generality [Jeshion]
Arithmetic is analytic and a priori, and thus it is part of logic
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 6. Logicism / d. Logicism critique
Frege only managed to prove that arithmetic was analytic with a logic that included set-theory [Quine]
Frege's platonism and logicism are in conflict, if logic must dictates an infinity of objects [Wright,C]
Why should the existence of pure logic entail the existence of objects? [George/Velleman]
Frege's belief in logicism and in numerical objects seem uncomfortable together [Hodes]
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 7. Formalism
Formalism fails to recognise types of symbols, and also meta-games [Brown,JR]
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / b. Intuitionism
Frege was completing Bolzano's work, of expelling intuition from number theory and analysis
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / c. Conceptualism
Abstraction from things produces concepts, and numbers are in the concepts
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 10. Constructivism / e. Psychologism
Mental states are irrelevant to mathematics, because they are vague and fluctuating
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 1. Nature of Existence
Affirmation of existence is just denial of zero
7. Existence / A. Nature of Existence / 4. Abstract Existence
If abstracta are non-mental, quarks are abstracta, and yet chess and God's thoughts are mental [Rosen]
The equator is imaginary, but not fictitious; thought is needed to recognise it
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 4. Ontological Dependence
Many of us find Frege's claim that truths depend on one another an obscure idea [Heck]
Parallelism is intuitive, so it is more fundamental than sameness of direction [Heck]
7. Existence / C. Structure of Existence / 7. Abstract/Concrete / a. Abstract/concrete
Frege refers to 'concrete' objects, but they are no different in principle from abstract ones [Dummett]
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 9. Vagueness / d. Vagueness as linguistic
Vagueness is incomplete definition [Koslicki]
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Ontological Commitment / a. Ontological commitment
For Frege, ontological questions are to be settled by reference to syntactic structures [Wright,C]
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 10. Ontological Commitment / c. Commitment of predicates
Second-order quantifiers are committed to concepts, as first-order commits to objects [Linnebo]
8. Modes of Existence / A. Relations / 4. Formal Relations / c. Ancestral relation
'Ancestral' relations are derived by iterating back from a given relation [George/Velleman]
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 1. Nature of Properties
Frege treats properties as a kind of function, and maybe a property is its characteristic function [Smith,P]
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / a. Nature of abstracta
Not all objects are spatial; 4 can still be an object, despite lacking spatial co-ordinates
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 2. Abstract Objects / c. Modern abstracta
Frege says singular terms denote objects, numerals are singular terms, so numbers exist [Hale]
Frege establishes abstract objects independently from concrete ones, by falling under a concept [Dummett]
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 3. Objects in Thought
For Frege, objects just are what singular terms refer to [Hale/Wright]
Without concepts we would not have any objects [Shapiro]
9. Objects / A. Existence of Objects / 5. Individuation / a. Individuation
Frege's universe comes already divided into objects [Koslicki]
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 1. Concept of Identity
The idea of a criterion of identity was introduced by Frege [Noonan]
Frege's algorithm of identity is the law of putting equals for equals [Quine]
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 3. Relative Identity
Geach denies Frege's view, that 'being the same F' splits into being the same and being F [Perry]
9. Objects / F. Identity among Objects / 6. Identity between Objects
Identity between objects is not a consequence of identity, but part of what 'identity' means [Dummett]
11. Knowledge Aims / A. Knowledge / 2. Understanding
To understand a thought you must understand its logical structure [Burge]
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 1. Nature of the A Priori
For Frege a priori knowledge derives from general principles, so numbers can't be primitive
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 2. Self-Evidence
Mathematicians just accept self-evidence, whether it is logical or intuitive
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 4. A Priori as Necessities
An a priori truth is one derived from general laws which do not require proof
A truth is a priori if it can be proved entirely from general unproven laws
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 8. A Priori as Analytic
Frege tried to explain synthetic a priori truths by expanding the concept of analyticity
12. Knowledge Sources / E. Direct Knowledge / 2. Intuition
Intuitions cannot be communicated [Burge]
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / d. Rational foundations
Justifications show the ordering of truths, and the foundation is what is self-evident [Jeshion]
14. Science / C. Induction / 1. Induction
Induction is merely psychological, with a principle that it can actually establish laws
In science one observation can create high probability, while a thousand might prove nothing
15. Nature of Minds / A. Nature of Mind / 1. Mind / c. Features of mind
Ideas are not spatial, and don't have distances between them
18. Thought / A. Modes of Thought / 1. Thought
Thought is the same everywhere, and the laws of thought do not vary
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 1. Concepts / a. Nature of concepts
Early Frege takes the extensions of concepts for granted [Dummett]
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 3. Ontology of Concepts / c. Fregean concepts
Concepts are, precisely, the references of predicates [Wright,C]
A concept is a non-psychological one-place function asserting something of an object [Weiner]
Fregean concepts have precise boundaries and universal applicability [Koslicki]
Psychological accounts of concepts are subjective, and ultimately destroy truth
18. Thought / D. Concepts / 5. Concepts and Language / b. Concepts are linguistic
A concept is a possible predicate of a singular judgement
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 1. Abstract Thought
Defining 'direction' by parallelism doesn't tell you whether direction is a line [Dummett]
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 2. Abstracta by Selection
Frege accepts abstraction to the concept of all sets equipollent to a given one [Tait]
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 3. Abstracta by Ignoring
Frege himself abstracts away from tone and color [Yablo]
If we abstract 'from' two cats, the units are not black or white, or cats [Tait]
18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 7. Abstracta by Equivalence
Frege's logical abstaction identifies a common feature as the maximal set of equivalent objects [Dummett]
Frege's 'parallel' and 'direction' don't have the same content, as we grasp 'parallel' first [Yablo]
Frege put the idea of abstraction on a rigorous footing [Fine,K]
Fregean abstraction creates concepts which are equivalences between initial items [Fine,K]
We create new abstract concepts by carving up the content in a different way
From basing 'parallel' on identity of direction, Frege got all abstractions from identity statements [Dummett]
You can't simultaneously fix the truth-conditions of a sentence and the domain of its variables [Dummett]
19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 7. Meaning Holism / a. Sentence meaning
Words in isolation seem to have ideas as meanings, but words have meaning in propositions
Never ask for the meaning of a word in isolation, but only in the context of a proposition
19. Language / E. Analyticity / 1. Analytic Propositions
A statement is analytic if substitution of synonyms can make it a logical truth [Boghossian]
Frege considered analyticity to be an epistemic concept [Shapiro]
19. Language / E. Analyticity / 2. Analytic Truths
All analytic truths can become logical truths, by substituting definitions or synonyms [Rey]
19. Language / E. Analyticity / 4. Analytic/Synthetic Critique
Frege fails to give a concept of analyticity, so he fails to explain synthetic a priori truth that way [Katz]
25. Society / E. State Functions / 4. Education / a. Education principles
To learn something, you must know that you don't know
26. Natural Theory / D. Laws of Nature / 6. Laws as Numerical
The laws of number are not laws of nature, but are laws of the laws of nature
28. God / B. Proving God / 2. Proofs of Reason / b. Ontological Proof critique
Because existence is a property of concepts the ontological argument for God fails
Existence is not a first-level concept (of God), but a second-level property of concepts [Potter]