Ideas from 'Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy' by Ludwig Feuerbach [1839], by Theme Structure

[found in 'The Fiery Brook: Selected Writings' by Feuerbach,Ludwig (ed/tr Hanfi,Zawar) [Anchor 1972,0-385-05682-6]].

green numbers give full details    |     back to texts     |     unexpand these ideas


1. Philosophy / C. History of Philosophy / 1. History of Philosophy
All philosophies presuppose their historical moment, and arise from it
                        Full Idea: Every philosophy originates as a manifestation of its time; its origin presupposes its historical time.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.59)
                        A reaction: There seems to be widespread agreement among continental philosophers about this idea, whereas analytic philosophers largely ignore, and treat Plato as if he were a current professor in Chicago.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 5. Aims of Philosophy / a. Philosophy as worldly
I don't study Plato for his own sake; the primary aim is always understanding
                        Full Idea: Plato in writing is only a means for me; that which is primary and a priori, that which is the ground to which all is ultimately referred, is understanding.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.63)
                        A reaction: It always seems to that the main aim of philosophy is understanding - which is why its central activity is explanation.
2. Reason / C. Styles of Reason / 1. Dialectic
Each proposition has an antithesis, and truth exists as its refutation
                        Full Idea: Every intellectual determination has its antithesis, its contradiction. Truth exists not in unity with, but in refutation of its opposite.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.72)
                        A reaction: This appears to be a rejection of the 'synthesis' in Hegel, in favour of what strikes me as a rather more sensible interpretation of the modern dialectic. Being exists in contrast to nothingness, and truth exists in contrast to its negation?
A dialectician has to be his own opponent
                        Full Idea: A thinker is a dialectician only insofar as he is his own opponent.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.72)
                        A reaction: Quite an inspirational slogan for beginners in philosophy. How many non-philosophers are willing to be their own opponent. In law courts and the House of Commons we assign the roles to separate persons. Hence rhetoric replaces reason?
3. Truth / A. Truth Problems / 3. Value of Truth
Truth forges an impersonal unity between people
                        Full Idea: The urge to communicate is a fundamental urge - the urge for truth. ...That which is true belongs neither to me nor exclusively to you, but is common to all. The thought in which 'I' and 'You' are united is a true thought.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.65)
                        A reaction: Sceptics may doubt that there are such truths, but this is certainly how we experience agreement - that there is some truth shared between us which is no longer the possession of either of us. Nice idea.
7. Existence / D. Theories of Reality / 11. Ontological Commitment / e. Ontological commitment problems
To our consciousness it is language which looks unreal
                        Full Idea: To sensuous consciousness it is precisely language that is unreal, nothing.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.77)
                        A reaction: Offered as a corrective to the view that our ontological commitments entirely concern what we are willing to say.
11. Knowledge Aims / C. Knowing Reality / 3. Idealism / d. Absolute idealism
The Absolute is the 'and' which unites 'spirit and nature'
                        Full Idea: The Absolute is spirit and nature. ...But what then is the Absolute? Nothing other than this 'and', that is, the unity of spirit and nature.
                        From: Ludwig Feuerbach (Towards a Critique of Hegel's Philosophy [1839], p.82)
                        A reaction: This is Feuerbach's spin on Hegel. He has been outlining idealist philosophy and the philosophy of nature in Schelling. Is this Spinoza's one substance?