Ideas from 'Realistic Rationalism' by Jerrold J. Katz [2000], by Theme Structure

[found in 'Realistic Rationalism' by Katz,Jerrold J. [MIT 2000,0-262-61151-1]].

green numbers give full details    |     back to texts     |     unexpand these ideas


1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 3. Philosophy Defined
Traditionally philosophy is an a priori enquiry into general truths about reality
                        Full Idea: The traditional conception of philosophy is that it is an a priori enquiry into the most general facts about reality.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xi)
                        A reaction: I think this still defines philosophy, though it also highlights the weakness of the subject, which is over-confidence about asserting necessary truths. How could the most god-like areas of human thought be about anything else?
Most of philosophy begins where science leaves off
                        Full Idea: Philosophy, or at least one large part of it, is subsequent to science; it begins where science leaves off.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxi)
                        A reaction: In some sense this has to be true. Without metaphysics there couldn't be any science. Rationalists should not forget, though, the huge impact which Darwin's science has (or should have) on fairly abstract philosophy (e.g. epistemology).
6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 1. Mathematical Platonism / b. Against mathematical platonism
'Real' maths objects have no causal role, no determinate reference, and no abstract/concrete distinction
                        Full Idea: Three objections to realism in philosophy of mathematics: mathematical objects have no space/time location, and so no causal role; that such objects are determinate, but reference to numbers aren't; and that there is no abstract/concrete distinction.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxix)
12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 5. A Priori Synthetic
We don't have a clear enough sense of meaning to pronounce some sentences meaningless or just analytic
                        Full Idea: Linguistic meaning is not rich enough to show either that all metaphysical sentences are meaningless or that all alleged synthetic a priori propositions are just analytic a priori propositions.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xx)
12. Knowledge Sources / D. Empiricism / 5. Empiricism Critique
Experience cannot teach us why maths and logic are necessary
                        Full Idea: The Leibniz-Kant criticism of empiricism is that experience cannot teach us why mathematical and logical facts couldn't be otherwise than they are.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxxi)
19. Language / A. Nature of Meaning / 1. Meaning
Structuralists see meaning behaviouristically, and Chomsky says nothing about it
                        Full Idea: In linguistics there are two schools of thought: Bloomfieldian structuralism (favoured by Quine) conceives of sentences acoustically and meanings behaviouristically; and Chomskian generative grammar (which is silent about semantics).
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxiv)
                        A reaction: They both appear to be wrong, so there is (or was) something rotten in the state of linguistics. Are the only options for meaning either behaviourist or eliminativist?
19. Language / B. Reference / 4. Descriptive Reference / a. Sense and reference
It is generally accepted that sense is defined as the determiner of reference
                        Full Idea: There is virtually universal acceptance of Frege's definition of sense as the determiner of reference.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxvi)
                        A reaction: Not any more, since Kripke and Putnam. It is one thing to say sense determines reference, and quite another to say that this is the definition of sense.
19. Language / C. Assigning Meanings / 5. Fregean Semantics
Sense determines meaning and synonymy, not referential properties like denotation and truth
                        Full Idea: Pace Frege, sense determines sense properties and relations, like meaningfulness and synonymy, rather than determining referential properties, like denotation and truth.
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxvi)
                        A reaction: This leaves room for Fregean 'sense', after Kripke has demolished the idea that sense determines reference.
19. Language / D. Propositions / 2. Abstract Propositions / a. Propositions as sense
Sentences are abstract types (like musical scores), not individual tokens
                        Full Idea: Sentences are types, not utterance tokens or mental/neural tokens, and hence sentences are abstract objects (like musical scores).
                        From: Jerrold J. Katz (Realistic Rationalism [2000], Int.xxvi)
                        A reaction: If sentences are abstract types, then two verbally indistinguishable sentences are the same sentence. But if I say 'I am happy', that isn't the same as you saying it.