green numbers give full details | back to texts | unexpand these ideas
| 22371 | Determinism threatens free will if actions can be causally traced to external factors |
| Full Idea: The determinism which worries the defender of free will is that if human action is subject to a universal law of causation, there will be for any action a set of sufficient conditions which can be traced back to factors outside the control of the agent. | |||
| From: Philippa Foot (Free Will as Involving Determinism [1957], p.63) | |||
| A reaction: She draws on Russell for this, but neither of them mention whether the causation is physical. Free will seems to imply non-physical causation. |
| 22372 | Not all actions need motives, but it is irrational to perform troublesome actions with no motive |
| Full Idea: We do not expect that everything a rational man does should be done with a motive, ...but we do expect a man to have a motive for many things that he does, and would count anyone who constantly performed troublesome actions without a motive as irrational. | |||
| From: Philippa Foot (Free Will as Involving Determinism [1957], p.66) | |||
| A reaction: Interestng, because the assessment of whether someone is 'rational' therefore needs a criterion for when a motive seems required and when not. 'Significant' actions need a motive? |
| 22373 | People can act out of vanity without being vain, or even vain about this kind of thing |
| Full Idea: It makes sense to say that a man acts out of vanity on a particular occasion although he is not in general vain, or even vain about this kind of thing. | |||
| From: Philippa Foot (Free Will as Involving Determinism [1957], p.69) | |||
| A reaction: Aristotle tells us that virtues and vices are habits, and also have an intellectual component, implying that the person believes in that sort of behaviour. Anyone can have 'a little moment of vanity'. |