green numbers give full details | back to texts | unexpand this idea
| 4577 | There is no necessity higher than natural necessity, and that is just regularity |
| Full Idea: In principle I see no higher or more austere necessity than natural necessity; and in natural necessity, or our attribution of it, I see only Hume's regularities | |||
| From: Willard Quine (Necessary Truth [1963], p.76) | |||
| A reaction: Presumably this allows logical necessity as a 'lower' necessity, but denies 'metaphysical' necessity, in line with Hume and other tough empiricists. Personally I adore metaphysical necessities, but they are a bit hard to establish conclusively. |