Ideas from 'Epistemic Operators' by Fred Dretske [1970], by Theme Structure

[found in 'Skepticism' (ed/tr DeRose,K /Warfield,Ted) [OUP 1999,0-19-511827-8]].

green numbers give full details    |     back to texts     |     unexpand this idea


13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / c. Knowledge closure
You have knowledge if you can rule out all the relevant alternatives to what you believe
                        Full Idea: The 'Relevant Alternatives' theory of knowledge said the main ingredient that must be added to true belief to make knowledge is that one be in a position to rule out all the relevant alternatives to what one believes.
                        From: report of Fred Dretske (Epistemic Operators [1970]) by Keith DeRose - Intro: Responding to Skepticism §6
                        A reaction: Dretske and Nozick are associated with this strategy. There will obviously be a problem in defining 'relevant'. Otherwise it sounds quite close to Plato's suggestion that we need true belief with 'logos'.