green numbers give full details | back to texts | unexpand these ideas
| 6866 | It is disturbing if we become unreal when we die, but if time is unreal, then we remain real after death |
| Full Idea: For the A-theorists called 'presentists' the past is as unreal as the future, and reality leaves us behind once we die, which is disturbing; but B-theorists, who see time as unreal, say we are just as real after our deaths as we were beforehand. | |||
| From: Robin Le Poidevin (Interview with Baggini and Stangroom [2001], p.174) | |||
| A reaction: See Idea 6865 for A and B theories. I wonder if this problem is only superficially 'disturbing'. Becoming unreal may sound more drastic than becoming dead, but they both sound pretty terminal to me. |
| 6867 | Existentialism focuses on freedom and self-making, and insertion into the world |
| Full Idea: I take existentialism to be the focus on the freedom and self-making of the human being, and his or her insertion into the world. | |||
| From: Robin Le Poidevin (Interview with Baggini and Stangroom [2001], p.222) | |||
| A reaction: I take 'self-making' to be the key here. If neuroscientists somehow 'proved' that there was no free will, I don't see that making any difference to existentialism. 'Insertion' seems odd, unless it refers to growing up. |
| 6865 | A-theory says past, present, future and flow exist; B-theory says this just reports our perspective |
| Full Idea: The A-theory regards our intuitive distinction of time into past, present and future as objective, and takes seriously the idea that time flows; the B-theory says this just reflects our perspective, like the spatial distinction between here and there. | |||
| From: Robin Le Poidevin (Interview with Baggini and Stangroom [2001], p.174) | |||
| A reaction: The distinction comes from McTaggart. Physics seems to be built on an objective view of time, and yet Einstein makes time relative. What possible evidence could decide between the two theories? |