Ideas from 'Real Natures and Familiar Objects' by Crawford L. Elder [2004], by Theme Structure
[found in 'Real Natures and Familiar Objects' by Elder,Crawford L. [MIT 2004,0-262-55062-8]].
green numbers give full details |
back to texts
|
unexpand these ideas
8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 1. Nature of Properties
13795
|
Properties only have identity in the context of their contraries
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The very being, the identity, of any property consists at least in part in its contrasting as it does with its own proper contraries.
|
|
|
|
From:
Crawford L. Elder (Real Natures and Familiar Objects [2004], 2.4)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
See Elder for the details of this, but the idea that properties can only be individuated contextually sounds promising.
|
9. Objects / B. Unity of Objects / 3. Unity Problems / c. Statue and clay
13798
|
Maybe we should give up the statue
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Some contemporary metaphysicians infer that one of the objects must go, namely, the statue.
|
|
|
|
From:
Crawford L. Elder (Real Natures and Familiar Objects [2004], 7.2)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
[He cites Zimmerman 1995] This looks like a recipe for creating a vast gulf between philosophers and the rest of the population. If it is right, it makes the true ontology completely useless in understanding our daily lives.
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 6. Essence as Unifier
13797
|
The loss of an essential property means the end of an existence
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The loss of any essential property must amount to the end of an existence.
|
|
|
|
From:
Crawford L. Elder (Real Natures and Familiar Objects [2004], 3)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
This is orthodoxy for essentialists, and I presume that Aristotle would agree, but I have a problem with the essence of a great athlete, who then grows old. Must we say that they lose their identity-as-an-athlete?
|
9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 9. Essence and Properties
13794
|
Essential properties by nature occur in clusters or packages
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
Essential properties by nature occur in clusters or packages.
|
|
|
|
From:
Crawford L. Elder (Real Natures and Familiar Objects [2004], 2.2)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
Elder proposes this as his test for the essentialness of a property - his Test of Flanking Uniformities. A nice idea.
|
13796
|
Essential properties are bound together, and would be lost together
|
|
|
|
Full Idea:
The properties of any essential nature are bound together....[122] so any case in which one of our envisioned familiar objects loses one of its essential properties will be a case in which it loses several.
|
|
|
|
From:
Crawford L. Elder (Real Natures and Familiar Objects [2004], 3)
|
|
|
|
A reaction:
This sounds like a fairly good generalisation rather than a necessary truth. Is there a natural selection for properties, so that only the properties which are able to bind to others to form teams are able to survive and flourish?
|