back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 12244

[from 'Real Essentialism' by David S. Oderberg, in 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 3. Individual Essences ]

Full Idea

Nominalism is consistent with belief in individual essences, but real essentialism postulates essences as universals (quiddities). Nominalists are nearly always empiricists, though the converse may not be the case.

Clarification

A quiddity is the what-it-is of a thing

Gist of Idea

Nominalism is consistent with individual but not with universal essences

Source

David S. Oderberg (Real Essentialism [2007], 2.1)

Book Reference

Oderberg,David S.: 'Real Essentialism' [Routledge 2009], p.20


A Reaction

This is where I part company with Oderberg. I want to argue that the nominalist/individualist view is more in tune with what Aristotle believed (though he spotted a dilemma here). Only individual essences explain individual behaviour.