back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 13630

[from 'Foundations without Foundationalism' by Stewart Shapiro, in 5. Theory of Logic / K. Features of Logics / 6. Compactness ]

Full Idea

It is sometimes said that non-compactness is a defect of second-order logic, but it is a consequence of a crucial strength - its ability to give categorical characterisations of infinite structures.

Gist of Idea

Non-compactness is a strength of second-order logic, enabling characterisation of infinite structures

Source

Stewart Shapiro (Foundations without Foundationalism [1991], Pref)

Book Reference

Shapiro,Stewart: 'Foundations without Foundationalism' [OUP 1991], p.-12


A Reaction

The dispute between fans of first- and second-order may hinge on their attitude to the infinite. I note that Skolem, who was not keen on the infinite, stuck to first-order. Should we launch a new Skolemite Crusade?

Related Idea

Idea 13618 Compactness means an infinity of sequents on the left will add nothing new [Bostock]