Full Idea
It would appear that any denial of the existence of continuants entails a denial of change.
Gist of Idea
If things don't persist through time, then change makes no sense
Source
Robin Le Poidevin (Intro to 'Questions of Time and Tense' [1998], 1)
Book Reference
'Questions of Time and Tense', ed/tr. Le Poidevin,R [OUP 2002], p.3
A Reaction
[He cites Lowe for this view] Presumably we don't just accept change at face value, in that case. Indeed, views about temporal parts or time-worms give a different account of change (though perhaps a less convincing one).