back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 15245

[from 'Causal Powers' by Harré,R./Madden,E.H., in 11. Knowledge Aims / B. Certain Knowledge / 2. Common Sense Certainty ]

Full Idea

It would be silly to suggest that what is a matter of experience must be justified by reason, and it makes no sense to say that what we are insisting upon as a matter of direct experience must itself be established by experience.

Gist of Idea

It is silly to say that direct experience must be justified, either by reason, or by more experience

Source

Harré,R./Madden,E.H. (Causal Powers [1975], 3.II)

Book Reference

Harré,R/Madden,E.H.: 'Causal Powers: A Theory of Natural Necessity' [Blackwell 1975], p.56


A Reaction

The first half is now known as the 'Moorean' view (Idea 6349). It does make sense, when faced with a weird experience, to assess and establish it by means of a combination of reason and other experiences. It's called 'coherence'!

Related Idea

Idea 6349 I can prove a hand exists, by holding one up, pointing to it, and saying 'here is one hand' [Moore,GE]