back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 15386

[from 'Ordinatio' by John Duns Scotus, in 8. Modes of Existence / E. Nominalism / 1. Nominalism / a. Nominalism ]

Full Idea

Scotus argued that if everything is singular, with no objective common feature, science would be impossible, as it proceeds from general concepts. General is the opposite of singular, so it would be inadequate to understand a singular reality.

Gist of Idea

If only the singular exists, science is impossible, as that relies on true generalities

Source

report of John Duns Scotus (Ordinatio [1302]) by Claude Panaccio - Medieval Problem of Universals 'John Duns'

Book Reference

'Routledge Companion to Metaphysics', ed/tr. Le Poidevin/Simons etc [Routledge 2012], p.53


A Reaction

[compressed] It is a fact that if you generalise about 'tigers', you are glossing over the individuality of each singular tiger. That is OK for 'electron', if they really are identical, but our general predicates may be imposing identity on electrons.