back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 16648

[from 'Ordinatio' by John Duns Scotus, in 8. Modes of Existence / B. Properties / 1. Nature of Properties ]

Full Idea

Accidents are principles of acting and principles of cognizing substance, and are the per se objects of the senses. But it is ridiculous to say that something is a principle of acting (either real or intentional) and yet does not have any formal being.

Gist of Idea

Accidents must have formal being, if they are principles of real action, and of mental action and thought

Source

John Duns Scotus (Ordinatio [1302], IV.12.1), quoted by Robert Pasnau - Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 10.5

Book Reference

Pasnau,Robert: 'Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671' [OUP 2011], p.196


A Reaction

Pasnau cites this as the key scholastic argument for accidental properties having some independent and real existence (as required for Transubstantiation). Rival views say accidents are just 'modes' of a thing's existence. Aquinas compromised.