back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 16742

[from 'Disputationes metaphysicae' by Francisco Suárez, in 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 14. Knowledge of Essences ]

Full Idea

We can almost never set out the essences of things, as they are in things. Instead, we work through their connection to some non-essential feature, and we seem to succeed well enough when we spell it out through the feature closest to the essence.

Gist of Idea

We only know essences through non-essential features, esp. those closest to the essence

Source

Francisco Suárez (Disputationes metaphysicae [1597], 40.4.16), quoted by Robert Pasnau - Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671 23.5

Book Reference

Pasnau,Robert: 'Metaphysical Themes 1274-1671' [OUP 2011], p.539


A Reaction

It is a common view that with geometrical figures we can actually experience the essence itself. So has science broken through, and discerned actual essences of things?