back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 16990

[from 'Naming and Necessity lectures' by Saul A. Kripke, in 10. Modality / D. Knowledge of Modality / 1. A Priori Necessary ]

Full Idea

People think 'necessary' and 'a priori' mean the same for two reasons: we can assess what is feasible in all possible world by running them through our heads, and something known a priori avoids looking at the world, so it must be necessary.

Gist of Idea

A priori = Necessary because we imagine all worlds, and we know without looking at actuality?

Source

Saul A. Kripke (Naming and Necessity lectures [1970], Lecture 1)

Book Reference

Kripke,Saul: 'Naming and Necessity' [Blackwell 1980], p.38


A Reaction

[compressed] Kripke denies this doctrine, and pulls the concepts apart. Kant seems to be the chief representative of the view he is attacking. Hossack defends the older view.