back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 16993

[from 'Naming and Necessity lectures' by Saul A. Kripke, in 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 3. Transworld Objects / a. Transworld identity ]

Full Idea

There is no reason why we cannot stipulate that, in talking about what would have happened to Nixon in a certain counterfactual situation, we are talking about what would have happened to HIM.

Gist of Idea

If we discuss what might have happened to Nixon, we stipulate that it is about Nixon

Source

Saul A. Kripke (Naming and Necessity lectures [1970], Lecture 1)

Book Reference

Kripke,Saul: 'Naming and Necessity' [Blackwell 1980], p.44


A Reaction

For many people (including me now, I think) this lays to rest the supposed problem of 'transworld identity' wrestled with by Kaplan and Lewis.