back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 21696

[from 'Lecture on Nominalism' by Willard Quine, in 6. Mathematics / C. Sources of Mathematics / 3. Mathematical Nominalism ]

Full Idea

'Nominalism' is distinct from 'extensionalism'. The main point of the latter doctrine is rejection of properties or attributes in favour of classes. But class are universals equally with attributes, and nominalism in the defined sense rejects both.

Gist of Idea

Nominalism rejects both attributes and classes (where extensionalism accepts the classes)

Source

Willard Quine (Lecture on Nominalism [1946], §3)

Book Reference

'Oxford Studies in Metaphysics vol.4', ed/tr. Zimmerman,Dean W. [OUP 2008], p.8


A Reaction

Hence Quine soon settled on labelling himself as an 'extensionalist', leaving proper nominalism to Nelson Goodman. It is commonly observed that science massively refers to attributes, so they can't just be eliminated.