back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 4700

[from 'Relativism' by Paul O'Grady, in 5. Theory of Logic / D. Assumptions for Logic / 1. Bivalence ]

Full Idea

Suggestions for a third value for truth are "indeterminate", or a scale running from "true", through "mostly true", "mainly true", "half true", "mainly false", "mostly false", to "false", or maybe even "0.56 true".

Gist of Idea

A third value for truth might be "indeterminate", or a point on a scale between 'true' and 'false'

Source

Paul O'Grady (Relativism [2002], Ch.2)

Book Reference

O'Grady,Paul: 'Relativism' [Acumen 2002], p.33


A Reaction

Anything on a sliding scale sounds wrong, as it seems to be paracitic on an underlying fixed idea of 'true'. "Indeterminate", though, seems just right for the truth of predictions ('sea-fight tomorrow').