back to idea for this text


Single Idea 5451

[from 'Open Society and Its Enemies:Hegel and Marx' by Karl Popper, in 9. Objects / D. Essence of Objects / 15. Against Essentialism ]

Full Idea

Karl Popper vehemently rejected the essentialism which underpins Plato and Aristotle, taking it to be a major obstacle to political, moral and scientific progress.

Gist of Idea

Popper felt that ancient essentialism was a bar to progress

Source

report of Karl Popper (Open Society and Its Enemies:Hegel and Marx [1945]) by Thomas Mautner - Penguin Dictionary of Philosophy p.179

Book Reference

Mautner,Thomas: 'Dictionary of Philosophy' [Penguin 1997], p.179


A Reaction

This makes Popper sound like an existentialist, which seems unlikely. Modern essentialism would say the opposite about science - that hunting for external imposed laws is a red herring, and we should try to understand essences.

Related Ideas

Idea 12176 Science does not aim at ultimate explanations [Popper]

Idea 12179 Essentialist views of science prevent further questions from being raised [Popper]