Full Idea
A strict retributivist is likely to say that once a crime is paid for, that's that; a deterrence theorist is likely to say that the protection of potential victims overrides the released convict's right to a free and fresh start.
Clarification
'Retributivists' believe in appropriate tit-for-tat punishments
Gist of Idea
Retributivists say a crime can be 'paid for'; deterrentists still worry about potential victims
Source
Robert Fogelin (Walking the Tightrope of Reason [2003], Ch.2)
Book Reference
Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.63
A Reaction
Interesting since the retributivist here has the more liberal attitude. Reformists will also have a dilemma when years in prison have failed to reform the convict. Virtue theorists like balance, and sensitively consider our relations with the criminals.