back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 6592

[from 'reports' by Pyrrho, in 13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique ]

Full Idea

The ancient Academic sceptics charged the Pyrrhonian sceptics with 'negative dogmatism' when they claimed that a certain kind of knowledge is impossible.

Clarification

'Dogmatism' is strong belief which is unjustified

Gist of Idea

Academics said that Pyrrhonians were guilty of 'negative dogmatism'

Source

report of Pyrrho (reports [c.325 BCE]) by Robert Fogelin - Walking the Tightrope of Reason Ch.4

Book Reference

Fogelin,Robert: 'Walking the Tightrope of Reason' [OUP 2004], p.114


A Reaction

It is this kind of point which should push us towards some sort of rationalism, because certain a priori 'dogmas' seem to be indispensable to get any sort of discussion off the ground. The only safe person is Cratylus (see Idea 578).

Related Idea

Idea 578 Cratylus decided speech was hopeless, and his only expression was the movement of a finger [Cratylus, by Aristotle]