back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 8963

[from 'Platonistic Theories of Universals' by J Hoffman/G Rosenkrantz, in 10. Modality / E. Possible worlds / 2. Nature of Possible Worlds / a. Nature of possible worlds ]

Full Idea

There are four models of the ontological status of possible worlds: conceptualist (mental constructions), combinatorial (all combinations of the actual world), abstract worlds (conjunction of propositions), and concrete worlds (collections of concreta).

Gist of Idea

Four theories of possible worlds: conceptualist, combinatorial, abstract, or concrete

Source

J Hoffman/G Rosenkrantz (Platonistic Theories of Universals [2003], 4)

Book Reference

'The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics', ed/tr. Loux,M /Zimmerman,D [OUP 2005], p.66


A Reaction

[the proponents cited are, in order, Rescher, Cresswell, Plantinga and Lewis] They dismiss Rescher and Cresswell, both of whom seem to me more plausible than Plantinga or Lewis. 'Possible' can't figure in the definition. Possible to us, or in reality?