back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 9308

[from 'A Philosophy of Boredom' by Lars Svendsen, in 12. Knowledge Sources / B. Perception / 2. Qualities in Perception / e. Primary/secondary critique ]

Full Idea

It is doubtful whether the traditional dichotomy between the strictly subjective and the strictly objective can still be maintained; if not, we must also revise the distinction between primary and secondary qualities.

Gist of Idea

If subjective and objective begin to merge, then so do primary and secondary qualities

Source

Lars Svendsen (A Philosophy of Boredom [2005], Ch.3)

Book Reference

Svendsen,Lars: 'A Philosophy of Boredom' [Reaktion Books 2005], p.108


A Reaction

Very perceptive. The reason why I am so keen to hang onto the primary/secondary distinction is because I want to preserve objectivity (and realism). I much prefer Locke to Hume, as empiricist spokesmen.