back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 9383

[from 'Two Dogmas of Empiricism' by Willard Quine, in 12. Knowledge Sources / A. A Priori Knowledge / 8. A Priori as Analytic ]

Full Idea

Quine showed the vacuity of the metaphysical concept of analyticity and the futility of the underwritten project - the linguistic theory of necessity. But that doesn't effect the epistemic notion of analyticity needed for a priori knowledge.

Gist of Idea

Metaphysical analyticity (and linguistic necessity) are hopeless, but epistemic analyticity is a priori

Source

comment on Willard Quine (Two Dogmas of Empiricism [1953]) by Paul Boghossian - Analyticity Reconsidered Concl

Book Reference

-: 'Nous' [-], p.20


A Reaction

This summarise Boghossian's view, that a priori knowledge is still analytic, once we get clear about analyticity. See Idea 9368 for his two types of analyticity. Horwich attacks the view.

Related Idea

Idea 9368 Epistemological analyticity: grasp of meaning is justification; metaphysical: truth depends on meaning [Boghossian]