back to ideas for this text


Single Idea 9985

[from 'Frege versus Cantor and Dedekind' by William W. Tait, in 18. Thought / E. Abstraction / 7. Abstracta by Equivalence ]

Full Idea

A different reading of abstraction is that it concerns, not the individuating properties of the elements relative to one another, but rather the individuating properties of the set itself, for example the concept of what is its extension.

Gist of Idea

Abstraction may concern the individuation of the set itself, not its elements

Source

William W. Tait (Frege versus Cantor and Dedekind [1996], VIII)

Book Reference

'Philosophy of Mathematics: anthology', ed/tr. Jacquette,Dale [Blackwell 2002], p.53


A Reaction

If the set was 'objects in the room next door', we would not be able to abstract from the objects, but we might get to the idea of things being contain in things, or the concept of an object, or a room. Wrong. That's because they are objects... Hm.