Combining Texts

Ideas for 'Mahaprajnaparamitashastra', 'Capital Vol. 3' and 'Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus'

unexpand these ideas     |    start again     |     choose another area for these texts

display all the ideas for this combination of texts


6 ideas

1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 1. Philosophy
What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: What we cannot speak about we must pass over in silence.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 7)
     A reaction: This is either a boring truism, or points towards some sort of verificationism (where we can speak meaninglessly). Compare Ideas 7973 and 6870.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 3. Philosophy Defined
I say (contrary to Wittgenstein) that philosophy expresses what we thought we must be silent about [Ansell Pearson on Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: I recognise the incredible force of Wittgenstein's closing statement in the 'Tractatus', but I hold the opposite view: philosophy exists to give expression to that which we think we can only remain silent about.
     From: comment on Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 7) by Keith Ansell Pearson - Interview with Baggini and Stangroom p.267
     A reaction: A wonderful remark, with which I totally agree. Compare Idea 1596. I think it is just a fact that philosophers are able to articulate a huge number of ideas which other intelligent people find very interesting but on which they are unable to speak.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 6. Hopes for Philosophy
If a question can be framed at all, it is also possible to answer it [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: If a question can be framed at all, it is also possible to answer it.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 6.5)
     A reaction: Just the sort of unsubstantiated metaphysical claim that philosophers are always making.
1. Philosophy / D. Nature of Philosophy / 7. Despair over Philosophy
The 'Tractatus' is a masterpiece of anti-philosophy [Badiou on Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: The 'Tractatus' is without doubt one of the masterpieces of anti-philosophy.
     From: comment on Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921]) by Alain Badiou - Mathematics and Philosophy: grand and little p.16
     A reaction: French philosophers do love making wicked remarks like that. It seems that analysis is anti-philosophy, or 'little' philosophy in Badiou's parlance.
This work solves all the main problems, but that has little value [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: I believe myself to have found, on all essential points, the final solution of the problems. ….and this work shows how little is achieved when these problems are solved.
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], Pref)
     A reaction: This is LW's deep pessimism about the value of philosophy, right from the start. You can only idolise LW if you agree with him on this.
Once you understand my book you will see that it is nonsensical [Wittgenstein]
     Full Idea: Anyone who understands me eventually recognises my propositions as nonsensical, when he has used them - as steps - to climb up beyond them. (He must, so to speak, throw away the ladder after he has climbed up it.)
     From: Ludwig Wittgenstein (Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus [1921], 6.54)
     A reaction: A much discussed passage. It can't possibly say that his book is pointless, because you can't attain this recognition without climbing his ladder. He speaks like an eastern guru. Perhaps Hume should have ended 'so commit my book to the flames'?