5991
|
For Aristotle, knowledge is of causes, and is theoretical, practical or productive [Aristotle, by Code]
|
|
Full Idea:
Aristotle thinks that in general we have knowledge or understanding when we grasp causes, and he distinguishes three fundamental types of knowledge - theoretical, practical and productive.
|
|
From:
report of Aristotle (works [c.330 BCE]) by Alan D. Code - Aristotle
|
|
A reaction:
Productive knowledge we tend to label as 'knowing how'. The centrality of causes for knowledge would get Aristotle nowadays labelled as a 'naturalist'. It is hard to disagree with his three types, though they may overlap.
|
19332
|
For Leibniz, divine understanding grasps every conceivable possibility [Leibniz, by Perkins]
|
|
Full Idea:
For Leibniz, what is this understanding which God has? What does it contain? All possibilities in all possible combinations, that is, everything which can be conceived.
|
|
From:
report of Gottfried Leibniz (works [1690]) by Franklin Perkins - Leibniz: Guide for the Perplexed 2.III
|
|
A reaction:
I like this, because it strikes me as essential that understanding should embrace possibilities as well as actualities. Perkins points out that the possibilities are restricted by an awareness of the limitations imposed by combination.
|
5509
|
Leibniz said dualism of mind and body is illusion, and there is only mind [Leibniz, by Martin/Barresi]
|
|
Full Idea:
Leibniz held that dualism of mind and body is an illusion and that both are really the same thing, and that this thing is mind.
|
|
From:
report of Gottfried Leibniz (works [1690]) by R Martin / J Barresi - Introduction to 'Personal Identity' p.22
|
|
A reaction:
I am puzzled by this, as Leibniz is famous for the view that mind and body are parallel. See idea 5038, and also 2109 and 2596. Monads are, of course, entirely mental, and are the building blocks of reality. Clearly I (and you) must read more Leibniz.
|