Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Against Coherence', 'In Defence of Pure Reason' and 'Foundations of Geometry'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
12 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / d. Rational foundations
|
3696
|
A priori justification requires understanding but no experience [Bonjour]
|
|
3703
|
You can't explain away a priori justification as analyticity, and you can't totally give it up [Bonjour]
|
|
3706
|
A priori justification can vary in degree [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
|
3699
|
The induction problem blocks any attempted proof of physical statements [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / a. Coherence as justification
|
21515
|
Incoherence may be more important for enquiry than coherence [Olsson]
|
|
21514
|
Coherence is the capacity to answer objections [Olsson]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique
|
21496
|
Mere agreement of testimonies is not enough to make truth very likely [Olsson]
|
|
21499
|
Coherence is only needed if the information sources are not fully reliable [Olsson]
|
|
21502
|
A purely coherent theory cannot be true of the world without some contact with the world [Olsson]
|
|
21512
|
Extending a system makes it less probable, so extending coherence can't make it more probable [Olsson]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 1. External Justification
|
3701
|
Externalist theories of justification don't require believers to have reasons for their beliefs [Bonjour]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 10. Anti External Justification
|
3702
|
Externalism means we have no reason to believe, which is strong scepticism [Bonjour]
|