Combining Texts
Ideas for
'Against Coherence', 'Reply to First Objections' and 'Knowledge:Readings in Cont.Epist'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
11 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 1. Justification / a. Justification issues
3752
|
Justification can be of the belief, or of the person holding the belief [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / a. Foundationalism
3753
|
Foundationalism aims to avoid an infinite regress [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 4. Foundationalism / f. Foundationalism critique
3754
|
Infallible sensations can't be foundations if they are non-epistemic [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / a. Coherence as justification
21515
|
Incoherence may be more important for enquiry than coherence [Olsson]
|
21514
|
Coherence is the capacity to answer objections [Olsson]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / c. Coherentism critique
21496
|
Mere agreement of testimonies is not enough to make truth very likely [Olsson]
|
21499
|
Coherence is only needed if the information sources are not fully reliable [Olsson]
|
21502
|
A purely coherent theory cannot be true of the world without some contact with the world [Olsson]
|
21512
|
Extending a system makes it less probable, so extending coherence can't make it more probable [Olsson]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 1. External Justification
3755
|
Justification is normative, so it can't be reduced to cognitive psychology [Bernecker/Dretske]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
3761
|
Modern arguments against the sceptic are epistemological and semantic externalism, and the focus on relevance [Bernecker/Dretske]
|