Combining Texts
Ideas for
'The Elm and the Expert', 'Wiener Logik' and 'The Case for Contextualism'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 3. Internal or External / b. Pro-externalism
18260
|
If we knew what we know, we would be astonished [Kant]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / B. Internal Justification / 5. Coherentism / a. Coherence as justification
19513
|
A contextualist coherentist will say that how strongly a justification must cohere depends on context [DeRose]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 5. Controlling Beliefs
2462
|
Control of belief is possible if you know truth conditions and what causes beliefs [Fodor]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
19514
|
Classical invariantism combines fixed truth-conditions with variable assertability standards [DeRose]
|
19515
|
We can make contextualism more precise, by specifying the discrimination needed each time [DeRose]
|
19510
|
In some contexts there is little more to knowledge than true belief. [DeRose]
|
19516
|
Contextualists worry about scepticism, but they should focus on the use of 'know' in ordinary speech [DeRose]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / b. Invariantism
19511
|
If contextualism is about knowledge attribution, rather than knowledge, then it is philosophy of language [DeRose]
|