Combining Texts
Ideas for
'The Case for Closure', 'How to Define Theoretical Terms' and 'Contextualism Defended (and reply)'
expand these ideas
|
start again
|
choose
another area for these texts
display all the ideas for this combination of texts
8 ideas
13. Knowledge Criteria / A. Justification Problems / 2. Justification Challenges / c. Knowledge closure
|
19551
|
How can we know the heavyweight implications of normal knowledge? Must we distort 'knowledge'? [Hawthorne]
|
|
19552
|
We wouldn't know the logical implications of our knowledge if small risks added up to big risks [Hawthorne]
|
|
19554
|
Denying closure is denying we know P when we know P and Q, which is absurd in simple cases [Hawthorne]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / C. External Justification / 6. Contextual Justification / a. Contextualism
|
19558
|
Our own intuitions about whether we know tend to vacillate [Cohen,S]
|
|
19561
|
We shouldn't jump too quickly to a contextualist account of claims to know [Cohen,S]
|
|
19563
|
The context sensitivity of knowledge derives from its justification [Cohen,S]
|
|
19560
|
Contextualism is good because it allows knowledge, but bad because 'knowing' is less valued [Cohen,S]
|
13. Knowledge Criteria / D. Scepticism / 6. Scepticism Critique
|
19559
|
Contextualists slightly concede scepticism, but only in extremely strict contexts [Cohen,S]
|